NACD and CGI
US Climate Governance Initiative
NACD is the proud US host chapter for the CGI. Explore how this initiative can provide your board with insights and tools for climate governance.
NACD Members
Please Log In.
Governance Research
Governance Surveys
Directorship Magazine
Boardroom Tool
Integrating Climate into Strategy and the Organization
Boards serve a critical role in engaging with management on the strategic direction of their organizations and in overseeing operations and risk management. Strategic and organizational integration is a foundation of Board Leadership for Growth and Resilience: Guiding Principles for Climate and Nature Governance developed by Chapter Zero Alliance, the World Economic Forum, and Deloitte. This article offers directors guidelines on planning and decision-making in this domain.
To be effective, climate strategy must link to an organization’s strategy and operations, addressing all material risks and opportunities. Research by Deloitte identified several key challenges C-suite leaders experience in integrating climate strategy and goals throughout the organization:
The board’s focus and engagement on climate—including how the organization is integrating climate considerations into strategy and operations—can provide impetus and direction to the C-suite.
Climate should be considered within the organization’s long-term strategy, as the transition to a low-carbon economy, consideration of water usage, and power-use efficiency are driving changes throughout the ecosystems of all types of enterprises. This requires boards to determine how management is factoring first- and second-order climate impacts into strategy, operations, and risk management across the organization and its supply chain.
The board plays a critical role in shaping and “pressure testing” an organization’s strategic direction. Through its dialogue with management on key assumptions underpinning strategy development, the board can help inject climate considerations into strategic planning. For example, explore how management’s assumptions about future business conditions would be affected by the physical or transition impacts of climate change. The board can also support the long-term investments needed to position the company for a low-carbon future, while balancing near-term financial performance. And the board can explore whether the company has a climate transition plan.
Many organizations’ climate programs started within their internal operations through initiatives such as energy, water-use, or waste reduction. These programs, often integrated with third-party frameworks or assessments like the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), provide several benefits, including reducing operational costs, mitigating climate impacts, and/or helping the organization to adapt to a shifting climate.
However, Deloitte research indicates that such initiatives may not fully integrate into compensation, operational KPIs (e.g., number of renewable power purchase agreements), or investment parameters (e.g., an internal carbon price), unless there is top-down support from the board and buy-in across the C-suite. One option to increase buy-in is to demonstrate how climate and sustainability help the company's business materially, whether it be from a risk-management or an opportunity-creation perspective. Companies can do this by quantifying, in economic terms, the incremental business the company can win because it has better sustainability programs than its competitors.
Boards oversee management’s efforts to manage and mitigate risks, including the effectiveness of the company’s enterprise risk management (ERM) programs. Boards should examine how climate has been integrated into the risk identification and assessment process—and should likewise ensure that risk analysis is effectively integrated with the corporate ERM process. For example, how has management assessed climate change’s direct risks to the organization, such as risk to physical assets or operations (e.g., unprecedented weather patterns impacting construction projects)? What were the scenarios and time frames used for their analysis? Boards can also review with management how climate will serve as a driver or amplifier of other risks (e.g., regulatory changes or shifting consumer patterns). The board should also consider how management is integrating climate adaptation or mitigation efforts into the ERM program (e.g., changes to the location and/or construction of sites to minimize potential flooding impacts).
Climate-related transformation often requires new processes and technologies, so it can be a catalyst for innovation and competitive advantage. Companies should consider how physical and transition climate impacts might inform new investment opportunities. For example, one company leverages its materials innovation to help customers meet their climate goals. Its enhanced glass used in medical vials requires less energy to produce—a valuable factor for companies looking to reduce Scope 3 emissions.
Board governance is an important catalyst for effective corporate climate stewardship and for driving focus, accountability, and transparency. As boards begin to integrate climate with the overall strategy and operations of the organization, here are some questions to consider: